Status: exhibited
This one isn't software. I'm including it because the exact same discipline runs through it — the idea that a claim of authorship has to be checkable, not just asserted — applied to a medium where almost nobody bothers to check.
The question underneath it
OMSORG started with a conversation, not a prompt. Over four months, I sat with members of a social-recovery community in Aarhus — people navigating mental illness, working across a gallery, a garden, and a counselling program — and asked them to describe what the place felt like, in their own words. Their language, not a prompt I typed, is what generated the nine large-format prints that came out of it.
The question underneath the whole project is about authorship. When a model can generate a plausible-looking image from three words typed by anyone, what does it actually mean for an image to come from someone specific? My answer here: it doesn't count unless you can trace the image back to the real human input that shaped it. That's a smaller, stranger cousin of the same conviction behind everything else on this page.
Proof of Process
Each of the nine works is minted on-chain, so the claim that these images exist and trace back to this project isn't something you have to take on my word. The collection — OMSORG by Yehor Kaliberda — lives at contract 0x8f293bFb5FAE4ac6957a82A06Cc42b82b8f98E70 on Base. Nine tokens, one per print: Stature, Passage, Core, Threshold, Oasis, Nobody, Alchemy, Awakening, Ruby. I call this the Proof of Process model. It's the same instinct as a merged pull request or a signed software release: don't just tell me it's real. Show me the chain that proves it.
The exhibition
Nine Giclée prints, shown at Galleri Gallo in Aarhus for six weeks, 22 March through 28 April 2026, under a signed contract. The community members whose words shaped the work were invited as guests of honor at the opening. I'm deliberately not naming anyone or quoting what they said here — what they shared was personal, offered in a specific context for a specific gallery, and republishing it word-for-word on an unrelated software portfolio isn't a call I get to make on their behalf. The work itself, and the fact that the show happened, is what's on the record.
Why this is here at all
I almost left this off the site — it isn't a system, there's no pull request, and none of CallMed AI's clients need to know about it to trust the engineering work. But "proof over promise" isn't a rule I only apply when someone's paying me for it. This is the one place I've applied the same standard to something that isn't code, and I'd rather show that than pretend the conviction only shows up on the clock.